jydsl.com

As the inauguration date for the newly elected president approaches, global expectations for the United States seem to be dwindlingA concerning trend has emerged, with several countries, notably China, rapidly divesting from U.STreasury bonds, dropping to levels not seen since 2009. This significant pullback from key investors has raised alarms regarding the stability of the dollar and its predominance in the international financial system.

In response to this unsettling development, the U.Sgovernment has urgently sought dialogue with China to address pressing economic issuesHowever, with less than two weeks remaining before the current administration's departure, the critical question arises: Will these discussions yield any substantial outcomes? On January 7, U.STreasury Secretary Janet Yellen conducted a pivotal video conference with He Lifeng, China's lead economic negotiator, where they deliberated the evolving Sino-American trade dynamics during this transitional period for the U.S

governmentThose familiar with U.S.-China relations recognize Yellen's name; her diplomatic engagement during previous visits to China has left a mark despite the challenges inherent within her roleUnlike many American politicians bound by conventional wisdom, Yellen represents a rare breed—pragmatic and forthright.

This recent interaction was laden with implications, as China officially communicated a commitment to maintaining dialogue with the U.Sduring this critical transitionThe statement emphasized the necessity of managing differences and ensuring stability in the bilateral relationshipThis development is significant; it underscores the current uncertainty clouding Sino-American relations from the U.Sperspective, revealing an urgent need for tangible commitments from ChinaAbsent such assurances, the American administration appears reluctant to make a seamless transition to the incoming administration.

The uneasy nature of the political transition period in the U.S

• Germany Faces Record Business Bankruptcies by 2025
• Identifying True High-Dividend Assets
• Timing the Stock Market is Challenging
• BOJ Rate Hike More Likely in January
• Housing Sector Shows Recovery Amid Stable Profit Outlook

is notableWhile each presidential term comes with its own cadre of advisors and aides, the changeover often leads to a temporary political vacuum, wherein both domestic and foreign policy initiatives risk stagnationIt is during this fragile phase that preemptive communication with China becomes critical.

Furthermore, the current scenario surrounding the dominance of the dollar reveals a stark reality: Japan, China, and the U.Kcurrently hold the largest amounts of U.Sdebt, but these countries have coincidentally reduced their holdings of U.STreasuries significantlyThis widespread divestment shakes the foundational confidence in American debt instruments within the financial markets.

An additional factor exacerbating this situation is the ongoing wave of "de-dollarization" driven primarily by RussiaProjections indicate that by 2025, the dollar’s share in the foreign exchange reserves of nations will dwindle to around 30%. Such a decline portends serious repercussions for the U.S

economy, specifically its ability to sustain a robust printing of dollars while balancing trade and economic relationships, particularly with China.

On the Chinese side, the response to these developments exhibits a certain level of strategic cautionChina's recent attitudes towards trade matters, particularly regarding U.Srestrictions, reflect an unprecedented directness previously rare in Sino-U.SinteractionsReports reveal that during the recent dialogue, China conveyed its concerns regarding America's new trade restrictions and expressed its position clearly, showcasing an assertiveness that indicates the seriousness with which China regards the U.Spolicies affecting its semiconductor industry.

This candid expression of dissatisfaction signals a stark shift; the current administration's actions have undeniably struck a nerve in China, generating palpable discontentWhile both countries have agreed to maintain contact, this does not imply cooperation or a vision of mutual benefits

Instead, there seems to be a stark acknowledgment of the divergent positions each party holds, resulting in polarized communications.

With this realization comes a larger narrative: China now discards any remnants of illusion regarding future U.S.-China relationsPreparing for confrontation rather than cooperative engagement emerges as the dominant themeThe metaphorical language of "struggle for peace" resonates deeply, which is a concept easily digestible by American policymakers.

Becoming increasingly apparent is the notion that China is expected to compromise on critical strategic issues in exchange for equitable treatment in trade mattersHowever, the imposition of these conditions can be viewed as an inconceivable demand in the realm of international fairness—a modern-day unequal treaty.

In the context of technological competition, for example, expectations are being thrust upon China to halt its advancement in high-end civilian technologies